Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICATT
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICATT

|

UNI-FIND

unicatt.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2015
Citazione:
Romagnoli, J., Salerno, M. P., Mamode, N., Calia, R., Spagnoletti, G., Bianchi, V., Maresca, M., Piccirillo, N., Putzulu, R., Piselli, P., Colaiori, E., Zini Tanzi, G., Citterio, F., Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment, <>, 2015; 47 (7): 2126-2129. [doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/71808]
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. METHODS: From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. RESULTS: Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). CONCLUSIONS: LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
Keywords:
TRANSPLANTATION; ABO INCOMPATIBLE
Elenco autori:
Romagnoli, Jacopo; Salerno, Maria Paola; Mamode, N; Calia, Rosaria; Spagnoletti, Gionata; Bianchi, Valentina; Maresca, Maddalena; Piccirillo, Nicola; Putzulu, Rossana; Piselli, P; Colaiori, Enzo; Zini Tanzi, Gina; Citterio, Franco
Link alla scheda completa:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/71808
Pubblicato in:
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Journal
  • Aree Di Ricerca

Aree Di Ricerca

Settori (2)


LS7_7 - Surgery - (2011)

Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0