Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICATT
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICATT

|

UNI-FIND

unicatt.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing after Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot—Does Modality Matter?

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2024
Citazione:
Leonardi, B., Sollazzo, F., Gentili, F., Bianco, M., Pomiato, E., Kikina, S. S., Wald, R. M., Palmieri, V., Secinaro, A., Calcagni, G., Butera, G., Giordano, U., Cafiero, G., Drago, F., Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing after Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot—Does Modality Matter?, <>, 2024; 13 (5): N/A-N/A. [doi:10.3390/jcm13051192] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/304698]
Abstract:
Background: Despite a successful repair of tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) in childhood, residual lesions are common and can contribute to impaired exercise capacity. Although both cycle ergometer and treadmill protocols are often used interchangeably these approaches have not been directly compared. In this study we examined cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) measurements in rToF. Methods: Inclusion criteria were clinically stable rToF patients able to perform a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and two CPET studies, one on the treadmill (incremental Bruce protocol) and one on the cycle ergometer (ramped protocol), within 12 months. Demographic, surgical and clinical data; functional class; QRS duration; CMR measures; CPET data and international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) scores of patients were collected. Results: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled (53% male, 20.5 ± 7.8 years at CPET). CMR measurements included a right ventricle (RV) end-diastolic volume index of 119 ± 22 mL/m2, a RV ejection fraction (EF) of 55 ± 6% and a left ventricular (LV) EF of 56 ± 5%. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2)/Kg (25.5 ± 5.5 vs. 31.7 ± 6.9; p < 0.0001), VO2 at anaerobic threshold (AT) (15.3 ± 3.9 vs. 22.0 ± 4.5; p < 0.0001), peak O2 pulse (10.6 ± 3.0 vs. 12.1± 3.4; p = 0.0061) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) (1932.2 ± 623.6 vs. 2292.0 ± 639.4; p < 0.001) were significantly lower on the cycle ergometer compared with the treadmill, differently from ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) max which was significantly higher on the cycle ergometer (32.2 ± 4.5 vs. 30.4 ± 5.4; p < 0.001). Only the VE/VCO2 slope at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) was similar between the two methodologies (p = 0.150). Conclusions: The majority of CPET measurements differed according to the modality of testing, with the exception being the VE/VCO2 slope at RCP. Our data suggest that CPET parameters should be interpreted according to test type; however, these findings should be validated in larger populations and in a variety of institutions.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
Keywords:
cardiopulmonary exercise testing; congenital heart disease; cycle ergometer; protocol selection; treadmill
Elenco autori:
Leonardi, B.; Sollazzo, Fabrizio; Gentili, F.; Bianco, Massimiliano; Pomiato, E.; Kikina, S. S.; Wald, R. M.; Palmieri, Vincenzo; Secinaro, A.; Calcagni, G.; Butera, G.; Giordano, U.; Cafiero, G.; Drago, F.
Link alla scheda completa:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/304698
Link al Full Text:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it//retrieve/handle/10807/304698/707133/jcm-13-01192.pdf
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Journal
  • Aree Di Ricerca

Aree Di Ricerca

Settori (2)


LS4_10 - The cardiovascular system and cardiovascular diseases - (2024)

Settore MEDF-01/A - Metodi e didattiche delle attività motorie
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0