Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICATT
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICATT

|

UNI-FIND

unicatt.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging.

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2011
Short description:
Van Stiphout, R., Lammering, G., Buijsen, J., Janssen, M., Gambacorta, M. A., Slagmolen, P., Lambrecht, M., Rubello, D., Gava, M., Giordano, A., Postma, E., Haustermans, K., Capirci, C., Valentini, V., Lambin, P., Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging., <>, 2011; 98 (1) (Gennaio): 126-133. [doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.002] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/6947]
abstract:
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an accurate predictive model and a nomogram for pathologic complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data. Accurate prediction could enable more individualised surgical approaches, including less extensive resection or even a wait-and-see policy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Population based databases from 953 patients were collected from four different institutes and divided into three groups: clinical factors (training: 677 patients, validation: 85 patients), pre-CRT PET-CT (training: 114 patients, validation: 37 patients) and post-CRT PET-CT (training: 107 patients, validation: 55 patients). A pCR was defined as ypT0N0 reported by pathology after surgery. The data were analysed using a linear multivariate classification model (support vector machine), and the model's performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The occurrence rate of pCR in the datasets was between 15% and 31%. The model based on clinical variables (AUC(train)=0.61±0.03, AUC(validation)=0.69±0.08) resulted in the following predictors: cT- and cN-stage and tumour length. Addition of pre-CRT PET data did not result in a significantly higher performance (AUC(train)=0.68±0.08, AUC(validation)=0.68±0.10) and revealed maximal radioactive isotope uptake (SUV(max)) and tumour location as extra predictors. The best model achieved was based on the addition of post-CRT PET-data (AUC(train)=0.83±0.05, AUC(validation)=0.86±0.05) and included the following predictors: tumour length, post-CRT SUV(max) and relative change of SUV(max). This model performed significantly better than the clinical model (p(train)<0.001, p(validation)=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The model and the nomogram developed based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data can accurately predict pCR, and can be used as a decision support tool for surgery after prospective validation.
Iris type:
Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
Keywords:
rectal cancer; predictive models
List of contributors:
Van Stiphout, Rg; Lammering, G; Buijsen, J; Janssen, Mh; Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta; Slagmolen, P; Lambrecht, M; Rubello, D; Gava, M; Giordano, Alessandro; Postma, Eo; Haustermans, K; Capirci, C; Valentini, Vincenzo; Lambin, P.
Handle:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/6947
Published in:
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Research Fields

Research Fields

Concepts (2)


LS7_8 - Radiation therapy - (2011)

Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0