Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICATT
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICATT

|

UNI-FIND

unicatt.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Comparison of Novice and Experienced Drivers Using the SEEV Model to Predict Attention Allocation at Intersections During Simulated Driving

Conference Paper
Publication Date:
2017
Short description:
Bos, A. J., Ruscio, D., Cassavaugh, N. D., Lach, J., Lach, J., Gunaratne, P., Backs, R. W., Comparison of Novice and Experienced Drivers Using the SEEV Model to Predict Attention Allocation at Intersections During Simulated Driving, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, (Salt Lake City, Utah. Iowa City, IA, 22-25 June 2015), Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Salt Lake City 2017: 120-126. [10.17077/drivingassessment.1560] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147342]
abstract:
We compared the eye movements of novice drivers and experienced drivers while they drove a simulated driving scenario that included a number of intersections interspersed with stretches of straight road. The intersections included non-hazard events. Cassavaugh, Bos, McDonald, Gunaratne, & Backs (2013) attempted to model attention allocation of experienced drivers using the SEEV model. Here we compared two SEEV model fits between those experienced drivers and a sample of novice drivers. The first was a simplified model and the second was a more complex intersection model. The observed eye movement data was found to be a good fit to the simplified model for both experienced (R2 = 0.88) and novice drivers (R2 = 0.30). Like the previous results of the intersection model for the experienced drivers, the fit of the observed eye movement data to the intersection model for novice drivers was poor, and was no better than fitting the data to a randomized SEEV model. We concluded based on the simplified SEEV model, fixation count and fixation variance that experienced drivers were found to be more efficient at distributing their visual search compared to novice drivers.
Iris type:
Atti di Convegno, Congresso, Giornate di studio, ecc., Workshop (in volume)
Keywords:
Visual Attention; Human Factors; Traffic Psychology; Safety; Human Errors; Eyetracking; Driving Simulations; Cognition
List of contributors:
Bos, Alexander J; Ruscio, Daniele; Cassavaugh, Nicholas D; Lach, Justin; Lach, Justin; Gunaratne, Pujitha; Backs, Richard W
Handle:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/147342
Full Text:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it//retrieve/handle/10807/147342/247393/Comparison%20of%20Novice%20and%20Experienced%20Drivers%20Using%20the%20SEEV%20Model.pdf
Book title:
Proceedings of the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design
  • Overview
  • Research Fields

Overview

URL

https://ir.uiowa.edu/drivingassessment/2015/papers/19/

Research Fields

Concepts (4)


SH4 - The Human Mind and its complexity: cognition, psychology, linguistics, philosophy and education - (2011)

SH4_4 - Cognitive and experimental psychology: perception, action, and higher cognitive processes - (2011)

Settore M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALE

Settore M-PSI/03 - PSICOMETRIA
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0