Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICATT
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICATT

|

UNI-FIND

unicatt.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Do Different Types of Microphones Affect Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients? A Pupillometry Study

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Ghiselli, S., Pizzol, E., Vincenti, V., Fabrizi, E., Salsi, D., Cuda, D., Do Different Types of Microphones Affect Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients? A Pupillometry Study, <>, 2024; 13 (4): 1-7. [doi:10.3390/jcm13041134] [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/300843]
abstract:
Background: It is known that subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) need to exert more listening effort to achieve adequate speech recognition compared to normal hearing subjects. One tool for assessing listening effort is pupillometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive directional microphones in reducing listening effort for CI recipients. Methods: We evaluated listening in noise and listening effort degree (by pupillometry) in eight bimodal subjects with three types of CI microphones and in three sound configurations. Results: We found a correlation only between sound configurations and listening in noise score (p-value 0.0095). The evaluation of the microphone types shows worse scores in listening in noise with Opti Omni (+3.15 dB SNR) microphone than with Split Dir (+1.89 dB SNR) and Speech Omni (+1.43 dB SNR). No correlation was found between microphones and sound configurations and within the pupillometric data. Conclusions: Different types of microphones have different effects on the listening of CI patients. The difference in the orientation of the sound source is a factor that has an impact on the listening effort results. However, the pupillometry measurements do not significantly correlate with the different microphone types.
Iris type:
Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
Keywords:
cochlear implant; hearing stimulation; listening effort; pupillometry; signal processing
List of contributors:
Ghiselli, S.; Pizzol, E.; Vincenti, V.; Fabrizi, Enrico; Salsi, D.; Cuda, D.
Handle:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/300843
Full Text:
https://publicatt.unicatt.it//retrieve/handle/10807/300843/682220/jcm-13-01134.pdf
Published in:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Journal
  • Research Fields

Research Fields

Concepts (2)


LS7_2 - Medical technologies and tools (including genetic tools and biomarkers) for prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of diseases - (2024)

Settore MEDS-18/A - Otorinolaringoiatria
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0